It's true that many of the leaders of the DSA are minorites, but that's best explained as a function of the self-hatred of the Whites who vote for them. A comparison of the counties that voted for El-Sayed to the county-by-income map of Michigan will show this.
I think what’s important to remember is that even though Zionists have money, they don’t have leverage, there’s nowhere else for them to go. Because of that when they give us lectures on affordability and burritos we should tell them to shut it and if they want their evil wars and handouts to their country they have to give us something.
Underpinning this is a core issue of the two party system that the idealogical drift pushing certain kinds of Democrats out of their party opens up the possibility of a Republican catering to their interests to compete. This is part of the story of how Trump finally sealed a victory in contested states like Pennsylvania by seizing the opportunity forecasted by the party flip of West Virginia in 2000 (which still elected a moderate Democrat senator until very recently).
As such, I agree we can expect more Jews to find themselves suddenly opened to supporting a Zionist candidate over the Palestinian supporter the Democrat party cannot suppress away. This eventually should have buyers remorse if the Democrats really find themselves incapable of winning national elections anymore, but it’s not clear to me if there is enough interest in non-interventionist right-wing circles to be courted by Democrats.
Some on the far fringes are already willing to give up on everything in exchange for opposing Israel. Fuentes et al. Though they will never be courted. We will see what happens to Tucker Carlson.
While the progressive vanguard is composed of these Long March types, the DSA revolution is powered by normies who are outraged by blatant ZOG and kleptocracy. The Right could have harnesssed the same energy if Trump 2.0 and the Trump GOP had not been bought by AIPAC.
I also believe that this is all planned out. However, I don’t think that “voting / voters” have anything to do with it.
Voting has been rigged for decades, and it’s never been more obvious than right now.
Legislation is on the table that could force the validation of voters, and both parties are blocking it. The only logical reason for both parties blocking voter validation measures -- is that both parties rely on cheating to achieve the desired outcome.
In other words, voting is fake. It’s only the perception of reality that matters.
The DSA is the logical path towards an authoritarian system, which I believe is the end goal.
Consider where we are right now. There is The SAVE America Act, which would at least make elections believable -- but it can’t get past the Republican senate?
Then consider this. We’re being told by our “representatives” that we “get what we vote for” -- however, we’re not allowed to prove -- that representatives are legitimately elected.
Living in the US is like living in an abusive relationship. Things happen to you, and you’re blamed for the outcome -- but We The People never agreed to any of this nonsense.
The people of California didn’t vote for laws to make it impossible to rebuild in the Palisades after a fire. Californians didn’t vote for *more* bums on the streets and more homeless encampments.
People in Oregon and Washington State didn’t vote to empower state government to remove children from the family -- if they refuse to provide “gender affirming care.”
Nobody voted to open the southern border and allow people to flood in. Nobody voted to give away billions of taxpayer dollars to illegal immigrants. Nobody voted to allow refugees to run massive fraud operations.
These are not things that sane people agree to, and yet, we’re expected to believe that the people living in these states -- who are somehow still making their economies work -- are voting to destroy their own lives?
No.
Things are being done to them -- and they’re accepting the consequences because they believe that a majority of people “voted” for these things -- when that was never the case.
That’s why so many people are leaving California, Oregon, Washington State, and New York right now.
They have learned that what’s being done to them was never “voted on” and the only corrective action -- for those who refuse the abuse -- is to move to another state and start over. Which is not a small decision by the way.
What we’re witnessing right now is a larger portion of the country, realizing that they have been lied to for decades, at least as long as they’ve been alive.
Voting won’t / can’t fix the problems we’re facing -- BECAUSE VOTING DIDN’T GET US TO WHERE WE ARE. These things were done *to* us, by people who were installed.
It’s time for the fantasy of representative government to die, and people to start working around the system, because the system is most certainly not rigged in our favor.
That’s what those moving to another state are attempting to do.
«Nobody voted to open the southern border and allow people to flood in.»
I am pretty sure that dozen of millions of middle-class people would did vote for that: mass immigration is a huge benefit their their incomes (from property and stocks) and saves them significant costs (from wages) and immigrants as a rule end up living in working-class and under-class areas, and middle-class voters and upper-class sponsors only see them when they deliver packages, do their gardening, clean their houses, stock their shops, etc.
Ask any middle-class voter: would you want to stop mass immigration given that your deliveries, cleaning, gardening, etc. cost twice as much and your house price fell by 50%?
«Then consider this. We’re being told by our “representatives” that we “get what we vote for” -- however, we’re not allowed to prove -- that representatives are legitimately elected.»
That is often irrelevant: what matters most is who selects the candidates. If only the "right" candidates get selected then which specific candidate the "losers" vote for matters only as to candidate careers, not as to which policies get made.
As someone wise wrote "In China the party cannot change but the policies can change; in the USA the party can change but the policies cannot change".
Those captured whites are all being led by the Third World. You can airlift every Muslim out of Dearborn, and the white douchebag class would have no hostile foreign leadership and moral authority. The DSA in the Chicago city council are all Hispanic, e.g. Marxican Sigio Lopez.
Actually Black DSA members will do just fine. Theres no such thing as the “black vote” holding back progressivism. The black vote is at least 40% fake, with fake ballots submitted in behalf of registered voters for Dems. Whoever controls the local party/election apparatus to do the ballot dumps will cast those votes for their preferred candidate. Clearly saw this in the LA mayoral primary. So cities like Atlanta, Houston, Charlotte, (and therefore the states theyre in) will be very easy to flip towards DSA candidates once the small canvasser/poll worker clique is replaced with DSA activists.
Hispanic, Black, neither minority group is a “moderating force” on the Democrat party bc neither group votes in large numbers, they just have ballots submitted in their name for the D on the ballot
It's true that many of the leaders of the DSA are minorites, but that's best explained as a function of the self-hatred of the Whites who vote for them. A comparison of the counties that voted for El-Sayed to the county-by-income map of Michigan will show this.
I think what’s important to remember is that even though Zionists have money, they don’t have leverage, there’s nowhere else for them to go. Because of that when they give us lectures on affordability and burritos we should tell them to shut it and if they want their evil wars and handouts to their country they have to give us something.
Underpinning this is a core issue of the two party system that the idealogical drift pushing certain kinds of Democrats out of their party opens up the possibility of a Republican catering to their interests to compete. This is part of the story of how Trump finally sealed a victory in contested states like Pennsylvania by seizing the opportunity forecasted by the party flip of West Virginia in 2000 (which still elected a moderate Democrat senator until very recently).
As such, I agree we can expect more Jews to find themselves suddenly opened to supporting a Zionist candidate over the Palestinian supporter the Democrat party cannot suppress away. This eventually should have buyers remorse if the Democrats really find themselves incapable of winning national elections anymore, but it’s not clear to me if there is enough interest in non-interventionist right-wing circles to be courted by Democrats.
Some on the far fringes are already willing to give up on everything in exchange for opposing Israel. Fuentes et al. Though they will never be courted. We will see what happens to Tucker Carlson.
While the progressive vanguard is composed of these Long March types, the DSA revolution is powered by normies who are outraged by blatant ZOG and kleptocracy. The Right could have harnesssed the same energy if Trump 2.0 and the Trump GOP had not been bought by AIPAC.
The DSA …
I believe this is a very thorough analysis.
I also believe that this is all planned out. However, I don’t think that “voting / voters” have anything to do with it.
Voting has been rigged for decades, and it’s never been more obvious than right now.
Legislation is on the table that could force the validation of voters, and both parties are blocking it. The only logical reason for both parties blocking voter validation measures -- is that both parties rely on cheating to achieve the desired outcome.
In other words, voting is fake. It’s only the perception of reality that matters.
The DSA is the logical path towards an authoritarian system, which I believe is the end goal.
Consider where we are right now. There is The SAVE America Act, which would at least make elections believable -- but it can’t get past the Republican senate?
Then consider this. We’re being told by our “representatives” that we “get what we vote for” -- however, we’re not allowed to prove -- that representatives are legitimately elected.
Living in the US is like living in an abusive relationship. Things happen to you, and you’re blamed for the outcome -- but We The People never agreed to any of this nonsense.
The people of California didn’t vote for laws to make it impossible to rebuild in the Palisades after a fire. Californians didn’t vote for *more* bums on the streets and more homeless encampments.
People in Oregon and Washington State didn’t vote to empower state government to remove children from the family -- if they refuse to provide “gender affirming care.”
Nobody voted to open the southern border and allow people to flood in. Nobody voted to give away billions of taxpayer dollars to illegal immigrants. Nobody voted to allow refugees to run massive fraud operations.
These are not things that sane people agree to, and yet, we’re expected to believe that the people living in these states -- who are somehow still making their economies work -- are voting to destroy their own lives?
No.
Things are being done to them -- and they’re accepting the consequences because they believe that a majority of people “voted” for these things -- when that was never the case.
That’s why so many people are leaving California, Oregon, Washington State, and New York right now.
They have learned that what’s being done to them was never “voted on” and the only corrective action -- for those who refuse the abuse -- is to move to another state and start over. Which is not a small decision by the way.
What we’re witnessing right now is a larger portion of the country, realizing that they have been lied to for decades, at least as long as they’ve been alive.
Voting won’t / can’t fix the problems we’re facing -- BECAUSE VOTING DIDN’T GET US TO WHERE WE ARE. These things were done *to* us, by people who were installed.
It’s time for the fantasy of representative government to die, and people to start working around the system, because the system is most certainly not rigged in our favor.
That’s what those moving to another state are attempting to do.
«Nobody voted to open the southern border and allow people to flood in.»
I am pretty sure that dozen of millions of middle-class people would did vote for that: mass immigration is a huge benefit their their incomes (from property and stocks) and saves them significant costs (from wages) and immigrants as a rule end up living in working-class and under-class areas, and middle-class voters and upper-class sponsors only see them when they deliver packages, do their gardening, clean their houses, stock their shops, etc.
Ask any middle-class voter: would you want to stop mass immigration given that your deliveries, cleaning, gardening, etc. cost twice as much and your house price fell by 50%?
«Then consider this. We’re being told by our “representatives” that we “get what we vote for” -- however, we’re not allowed to prove -- that representatives are legitimately elected.»
That is often irrelevant: what matters most is who selects the candidates. If only the "right" candidates get selected then which specific candidate the "losers" vote for matters only as to candidate careers, not as to which policies get made.
As someone wise wrote "In China the party cannot change but the policies can change; in the USA the party can change but the policies cannot change".
https://blissex.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/poliusabossesofsenate.jpeg
Those captured whites are all being led by the Third World. You can airlift every Muslim out of Dearborn, and the white douchebag class would have no hostile foreign leadership and moral authority. The DSA in the Chicago city council are all Hispanic, e.g. Marxican Sigio Lopez.
I still believe a new party is needed. I have no faith in the Republican Party. America first party.
Hating israeli influence could, in theory, allow for some “bipartisan” maneuvers. Shame the DSA are violently insane and hate white people.
Maybe, but there’s a reason it’s called horseshoe theory and not circle theory- they don’t actually touch.
Actually Black DSA members will do just fine. Theres no such thing as the “black vote” holding back progressivism. The black vote is at least 40% fake, with fake ballots submitted in behalf of registered voters for Dems. Whoever controls the local party/election apparatus to do the ballot dumps will cast those votes for their preferred candidate. Clearly saw this in the LA mayoral primary. So cities like Atlanta, Houston, Charlotte, (and therefore the states theyre in) will be very easy to flip towards DSA candidates once the small canvasser/poll worker clique is replaced with DSA activists.
Hispanic, Black, neither minority group is a “moderating force” on the Democrat party bc neither group votes in large numbers, they just have ballots submitted in their name for the D on the ballot